«Home

Do We Really Need 42 Ministers?

With the recent widely-expected dissolution of the Federal Executive Council by Acting President Dr. Ebele Goodluck Jonathan, a deep reflection into the composition and workings of our government mechanisms is called for. This is with a view to ascertaining the utility of draining scarce resources in servicing of personnel costs and overheads with a record forty two ministers, each with no less than ten to fifteen aides and hundreds of hangers-on.

In fashioning a clear 3 point Agenda for the (Acting) President, namely electoral reforms, cultural reorientation (rebranding of attitude) and steady electricity, his Advisers should insist on reducing the ministerial slots to what is rational and not what is ‘politically expedient’. Nigerians are not difficult to govern; it is the elite that always obstruct good policies that will favour the people once it may not guarantee their own continued relevance and pecuniary sustenance.

It is easy to argue that unemployment can be abated by having forty two ministers so that if each has about twenty aides (both the official ones in Abuja and the retinue of support staff and hangers-on) that comes to about eight hundred and forty families who are literarily ‘guaranteed’ of stable food and provisions for the period their oga’s tenure lasts. But I still think that it is a narrow, short term and defeatist perspective, because if we do things the proper way and each ministry or minister passionately and patriotically puts in a mere 60% of genuine and honest work, as Mr Odom tried to exemplify, our country will be well on the way to economic and socio-political stability and that to me is more secure, purposeful and long lasting for the greater number of Nigerians than just a mere 840 families in a country of about 140 million.

My point is clear, albeit it may sound un-Nigerian, for a direct beneficiary of a system to speak against that (warped) system. We don’t need more than fifteen ministries as against the present twenty eight ministries which are at best conduit pipes for draining our resources through bogus contracts that are either shabbily done or not done at all. And if about fifteen ministries under the present arrangement have been operating without ministers of state, then we might as well scrap that concept of minister of state, which in any case is laden with unimaginable struggles for space and relevance with the senior ministers often seeing them as a little more than just aides.

For avoidance of doubt, the following ministries had only one minister in the last dispensation; Justice, Aviation, Power, Sports, science/Tech, Defence, Environment, Labour, Mines, National Planning, Police Affairs Transport, and Woman Affairs.

So if these ministries can stand with only one minister, why do we need to create confusion and the shameful battle for turfs between ministers and their ministers of state? With a good breed of permanent secretaries and directors, any seasoned technocrat or Administrator can comfortably man one ministry and give Nigerians results within the next fifteen months.

And in point of fact, we also need to close down some ministries or better still merge them with other related ones to avoid duplication and or over lapping of schedules. For instance, if our ministry of Works and Housing is really effective under a development-crazy patriot like Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, we may not need to have a separate ministry for Abuja or Niger Delta. And for crying out loud, did we honestly need to waste time and resources convening another talk-shop in Warri on the same amnesty issue for which the Ledum Mitee committee has already turned in useful and broad based solutions? I guess that was the message the MEND guys were trying to pass across, that all they want to see in the region henceforth are Julius Berger bulldozers and caterpillars. Its time really to stop these seminars and give people like Prof Pat Utomi the chance to make the Singaporean change he has cried so much about!

Who has ever heard of a minister of London or Washington? It is the ineptitude of existing structures and the lack of political will on the part of past leaders that keep making them talk of creation of new ministries and agencies and commissions right from the time of Willinsk.

Why can’t the police join the other services like Immigration, Prisons and Civil Defence under the Interior ministry as is found in other societies?

What is special about a Special Duties ministry? Why would women, with all their claims to equality with men, allow themselves to be treated as if they are physically or mentally challenged, by awarding them a separate ministry? They should be asking why there is no ministry for men. For that is the stuff true women’s liberation should be made of. Women affairs can better still be part of culture, Tourism and social Development. Why can’t we have a ministry of transport that coordinates Air, Land and Sea activities instead of another separate ministry for Aviation that asks for 63 billion naira just to expand a runway?

Youth and sports Development are complementary and can be handled very well by a seasoned entrepreneurial administrator

Like Prof Pat Utomi, (have you noticed how most sports administrators are sit tight dictators? - Amos Adamu, Isa Hayatou, Sepp Blatter and even Dr. Rafiu Ladipo of supporters club fame)

Akuneme was an aide to former Minister Julius Chika Odom.

http://news.dailytrust.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=16052:do-we-need-42-ministers&catid=49:opinion&Itemid=200

Avatar
Newbie
9 answers

You guys never seen anything!

By the time Goodluck finishes with you, you will beg him to leave.

1. Signed out $3billion in two weeks

2. His wife stolen $2,000,000.00

3. He has about 40 advisers and now 42 ministers

All of these for less than 9months in office.

0
Avatar
Newbie

42 ministers is not too bad if it is well managed.South Africa has 42 ministries too but unlike  Nigeria where the president and his minister are total morons,south Africa credible ministers.

http://www.info.gov.za/aboutgovt/dept.htm

P.S Do you know that the Nigerian Government does not have an official website?

Do you know that PDP does not have official website.

That should tell you that Jonathan is a fake dude and he has his head up is a.s.s

0
Avatar
Newbie

a@ OP good write up.

All what you wrote makes a lot of sense to people who are not committed to the progression of Nigeria, what the elites are only interested in is siphoning money into their bank account by any means possible, so by creating unneccessary bureaucratic ministires or departments will give them the chance to keep looting.

I think we need a radical overhaul of the system but no ones has the gut to do this, very sad indeed.

0
Avatar
Newbie

No, but how esle would they justify the looting?

0
Avatar
Newbie

so the more, the better (in view of the reasons raised above)

0
Avatar
Newbie

Here is another view which i subscribe to;

Mr. Jonathan's decision to take a pragmatic, as opposed to radical, approach in his composition of a cabinet raises suspicions that he is interested in contesting next year's Presidential elections. It appears that he is keen to explore the possibilities of building a political base across the country, by appointing prominent politicians as opposed to politically inexperienced technocrats. By allowing the state governors to nominate the new ministers he also seems eager to avoid alienating them, especially against the backdrop of their complaints about the constitution of the Presidential Advisory Committee.

On their part, Nigerians appear to be preparing themselves to expect no miracles in the coming months. Much of the internet commentary over the last 48 hours regarding the list has been heavily tinged with frustration, and disappointment. It is hard to blame anyone. To put it mildly, this cabinet, heavy on recycled material, is one weak, uninspiring assemblage.

0
Avatar
Newbie

we don't even need ministers at all,in this administration.

With only 12 months left in the life of this administration,why not just let the perm secs in the ministries steady the ship and the presidency provides direction in certain critical areas?

It is not like anything meaningful is expected from Jonathan.

These ministers will only create a bloated atmosphere,take time to settle down, introduce their own agenda and siphon their own egunje.

at the end of the day,we are worse off than when we first started.

0
Avatar
Newbie

No we don't.

And all these Ministers have Special advisers and Special assistants.

It's just their own idiotic way of distributing wealth. . . . . .

0
Avatar
Newbie

No we don't----- its a way to create unnecessary bureaucracy.

0
Avatar
Newbie
Your answer
Add image

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.