I mean there had to be mature life forms, at least a pair that propagated. Lets examine the schools of thought and really see what is logical and what is not.
One school says that life started with a single cell under certain conditions. Another school says that an intelligent and very powerful being created life.
The theory of evolution advocates that certain molecules just happened to fit together under certain conditions and somehow a cell was formed. This cell over time somehow developed the method to become multi-cellular which was its way of adapting to its environment. So the key word here is gradual development without any outside control. in other words life came about naturally on its own through natural forces.
Lest I forget the required elements that brought the cell together actually came from a universal explosion, or big bang.
The other argument is that an intelligent Being created fully grown or mature life forms that were equipped to make other life forms.
Which one of those arguments require stronger faith to believe in? What are the chances that life could have come forth from an explosion?
And even their own teaching on Thermodynamics counter the very argument of the TOE, because the 2nd law states that matter moves from a state of order to disorder within a closed system, although it matters not if its closed or open. Things degenerate. Just as the very bible teaches. Sin is causing this part of the universe to age including humans. Living matter as well as non-living matter are rusting and degenerating.
Can the TOE account for the degeneration of matter? Can it account for the degeneration of morals and social values? What has become of the gradual development among life forms? can the TOE account for the increased spate of diseases that is wreaking havoc on human life?
What next evolutionists?