Imagine if a book that claims to have it's source 4rm God to have disagreementssss in the first hand report of one of the book's so called saints. It is no little doubt that the saints indeed do exist as mentioned in the BOOK of books(Al Qur'an) but their genuiness has been maniackly altered, though, all the followers of jesus (may the peace of Allah be upon him) where indeed accepted by Allah save for one who claimed to be a saint, whereas he is a devil in a human flesh as i bring forth to u folks these verses 4rm the bible 4 y'all to read and think about it. Any one might say we (non-christian) would not understand the words of the bible all because the spirit is not in us yet! But come on the apostoles where spiritless be4 jesus came upon them. But i leav it all to you both, (those with spirit and the spiritless). ACT:-9, v: 7 (the men who were travelling with saul had stopped, not saying a word; THEY HEARD THE VOICE but could not see any one)
Act 22 :- v 9 (the men with me saw the light BUT DID NOT HEAR THE VOICE OF THE ONE WHO WAS SPEAKING) My brothers/sisters in both narrations which happens to be the soul foundation of scul's redemption and conversion, we find in them disagreement of the highest order which brings questions like -is the bible indeed the word of God? Then why would he have inspired the authors of these two verses to be confusing at least the bible says some where in it verses that;- God is not the author of confusion. 2 did saul saw christ at all? Hell no is definatly gonna be the answer coz if indeed the holy spirit did inspire the bible then, where was HE (GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT) when saul was meeting christ (GOD THE SON) and when the incident was to be reported. The one and only possible explanation 4 all this is to conclude that saul never met jesus, never was he a true christ-like, and never was he fit to be called a follower of christ not to think of being called a saint, but anyway, these are just my own findings of the fact that you are to have a re-cheek over ur life!