«Home

Judas Iscariot: Betrayer Or Enabler?

Judas Iscariot, the betrayer of Jesus, ranks as the most hated and despised character in the Bible with the possible exception of Satan. Is such intense loathing justified, or is Judas the victim of biased reporting? Interestingly enough the sole source of information on Judas is the New Testament gospels and the Book of Acts all of which were written long after the events allegedly took place. He receives not a single mention in the writings of Paul, the Gospel of Thomas, or the reconstructed document, Quelle (Q). Also, any mention of Judas is conspicuously absent from the writings of such important first century Jewish historians as Philo Judaeus and Flavious Josephus.

Judas first appears in the nineteenth verse of the third chapter of the Gospel of Mark, the oldest of the canonical gospels, where he is appointed by Jesus as one of his twelve disciples. In this passage we are tipped off in advance of Judas’ treachery. The authors of Matthew and Luke, recognizing a good thing, repeat Mark’s version almost verbatim. The author of John does likewise but embellishes the story. In John 6:70-71 Jesus announces that one of the twelve, Judas, is a devil. In John 12:4-6 we learn Judas was also a thief. At John 13:18 Jesus says, obviously in reference to Judas, that he made his choices “so that scripture might be fulfilled.” He then quotes Psalm 41:9 “He that eateth my bread lifted up his heel against me.” This, in all probability, provided the inspiration for the betrayal story.

As was predicted, Judas went to the chief priests and offered to identify Jesus. They accepted his offer and agreed to pay him thirty pieces of silver which brings up another perplexing question. Why would the authorities pay to have someone pointed out to them whom they already knew? In Matthew 26:55 Jesus says to those who came to arrest him, "I sat daily with you teaching in the temple, yet ye laid no hold on me."

Judas proceeds to identify Jesus by way of that treacherous kiss, and that’s the last we hear of him in the gospels of Mark, Luke and John. However, the author of Matthew doesn’t let it drop there. Apparently Judas’ conscience got the better of him because according to Matthew 27:3-5 he made a sincere attempt to repent but was denied forgiveness. In a gesture of frustration he flung the money on the temple floor and went and hanged himself. Matthew goes on to say that the chief priests and the elders used the money to buy a piece of land. Because it was bought with blood money, the land became known as "The Field of Blood."

In Matthew 18:21-22 when Peter came to him, and asked, “Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? Till seven times?” Jesus replied, "I say not unto thee, until seven times: but, until seventy times seven." Therefore, wasn’t Jesus obligated by his own words to forgive Judas? But instead of forgiving him, Jesus openly cursed Judas when during Passover Seder (Matthew 26:24; Mark 14:21) he said, "But woe to that one by whom the Son of Man is betrayed for it would have been better for him had he never been born". Contrary to Peter, Judas never denied Jesus. While his action may not have been all together ethical, Judas, unlike Peter, committed neither apostasy nor blasphemy, the two unforgivable sins.

Had the Judas story ended with the betrayal followed by the suicide everything might have been hunky-dory, but the writer of Acts couldn't leave well enough alone. In 1:15-19 he tells us that Judas didn't give the money back; he invested it in real estate. We also learn that Judas didn’t commit suicide; his death was accidental. Because of the messiness of this accident, the property became known as (you guessed it) "The Field of Blood." So, did Judas commit suicide as the writer of Matthew claims or was his death an accident as we are told in Acts? Also, was this the same land that the priests bought, or were there two fields of blood? But, it gets worse.

Mark 16:14 and Luke 24:33 state that following his resurrection Jesus appeared to "the eleven." Who was missing? After all that had transpired one would just naturally think it was Judas. Apparently not, because in John 20:24 we learn that the one missing was Thomas. Therefore the eleven had to include Judas. To further confuse things, Paul says in 1 Corinthians 15:5 that following his resurrection Jesus was seen by “the twelve.” This had to include Judas because it wasn't until after the ascension, some forty days after the resurrection (Acts 1:3), that another person, Matthias, was voted in to replace Judas (Acts 1:26). So, apparently Judas neither committed suicide nor died by accident. In Acts 1:25 we are told that Judas "turned aside to go to his own place."

Another clue confirming the absence of the Judas story in the earliest Christian documents occurs in Matthew 19:28 and Luke 22:28-30. Here Jesus tells his disciples that they will “sit on the twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.” No exception is made for Judas even though Jesus was aware of his impending act of betrayal. The answer may lie in the fact that the source of these verses is Q (QS 62). Q predates the gospels and is considered to be one of the earliest Christian documents. It was obviously written before Judas and the betrayal story were invented by the writer of Mark.

For centuries Judas Iscariot has been held up as the archetypical traitor, the exemplar of treachery, the quintessential turncoat. This is strange indeed when one considers Acts 1:16. Here Peter tells us, "This scripture (Psalm 69:25) must needs have been fulfilled, which the Holy Ghost by the mouth of David spake before concerning Judas, which was guide to them that took Jesus." So according to Peter, Judas' betrayal was a part of God's grand plan all along. Not only did Judas serve as a vehicle through which key Old Testament prophecy might be fulfilled, it was by way of his betrayal that Jesus was able to complete his earthly mission. One might say that it was a dirty job, but somebody had to do it. Judas was in reality an enabler. Instead of hating and reviling him, Christians should appreciate Judas’ contribution.

Source: http://www.inu.net/skeptic/judas.htm

[Last paragraph of that article not included for obvious reasons.]

P. S. Please, please, and please, this is not about me, and it is not my article, and as such, nobody should direct any inflammatory comments at me. I created this topic so that core issues on this subject may be compromised, and misconceptions totally cleared. Please deal with the issue at hand, and stick to it. That's going to be really appreciated by me and those willing to learn. Thanks for your anticipated co-operation.

Regards.

Avatar
Newbie
30 answers

@backslider.

I have decided not to indulge in any argument that lacks proofs, facts etc but your above post is just too good to be ignored. As a result, I have decided to reply you.

To be honest with you, I do pity christians a lot. They believe that they know everything whereas if they have been reading their bible very well, they would have been seeing all these facts muslims have been telling them. This is the time to be relying on the sayings of pastors, Alfas, Imams etc, rather a time where you go out and make research about the God you are worshipping and how reliable and trustworthy is the means (channel) you are using in getting to Him.

Christians have been labelling muslims as being the one that has been relying on what their leaders have been telling them, but I want you to know that, Islam is not like that and muslims do not do such a thing. Allah even told us to know him before we worship Him, there are verses from the Glorious Quran that speak on acquiring knowledge. Muslims do not follow the sayings of any Alfa or whatever, we believe in proofs, facts etc. If anybody bring anything strange to Islam, it will first be verified before taking/accepting it.

Now to your post.

Answer to your Ist paragraph

How could you be equating Creation with Creator when there are verses in the bible that distinguishes the two. There is a confusion in the christian world as to the deity of jesus christ. Some christians will tell you that he is not God that he is only the messenger while some will tell you that he is God. Where the confusion lies is from the book of John 1 v1. Here, those christians that are claiming that jesus is God hold on the verse but never take the pains to read the remaining verses. They never even bother to find out the hebrew and the greek meaning of the word, 'God' as being used in the verse. If you can lay your hands on the Jehovah Witness bible, you will read that the very verse (john 1 v 1) that contains the word 'God' in other bibles is written with small 'g' in their bible, thereby following the real and true interpretation of the word 'God' as being used in the verse. Light will be shed on John 1 v 1 later.

Also, there are countless verses that differentiate God from Jesus making us see that Jesus was sent by God to Israelite alone.

Brother, why not fear that Day when Jesus will deny you! The day God will summon Jesus asking him whether Jesus told you to be worshipping him.

Read below

Quran 5 v 116 : And (remember) when Allah will say (on the day of Ressurection): O Isa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)! Did you say unto men: ‘worship me and my mother as two gods besides Allah? ‘He will say: ‘glory be to You! It was not for me to say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, you would surely have known it. You know what is in my inner-self though I do not not know what is in Yours, Truly, only You, are the All-Knower of all that is hidden (and unseen)

V 117: “ Never did I say to them aught except what You (Allah) command me to say, ‘worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord’. And I was a witness over them while I dwelt amongst them, but when You took me up, You were the Watcher over them, and You are a Witness to all things. (This is a great admonition and warning to the Christians of the whole world).

V 118: If you punish them, they are Your slaves and if you forgive them, verily, You only are the All-Mighty, the All-Wise.

A word is enough for the wise.

To your 2nd paragraph

I have decided not to participate in any blind argument that lacks proofs, facts etc because you christians believe that you know everything and that you are on the right path with the right religion. I replied you here because of your blasphemous statement.

To your 3rd Paragraph

Point of correction. We muslims believe in Jesus, his miraculous birth, his ascension, his miracles, he was given a gospel, he was sent to the Israelites etc. Common, be sincere with yourself, if we do not believe in him, you wouldnt be reading his story and that of his mother in our book.

It is not only muslims that are saying your bible is corrupt, some verses in your bible even said so which I have been giving to you all these while.

To your 4th paragraph

I pity your soul for all these blasphemous statement you have been uttering. If you do not believe in someone does not mean that you shouls speak ill of that person. Mind you, its this same prophet that will intercede for you on D day. Also, it will be better for you to believe in Him and the Holy Quran so that all your deeds will not turned un-accepted.

Muslims have been providing proof for you even from your bible on the prophesy of this last prophet but due to arrogance, pride etc, you ignored the message. Why not stop deceiving yourself and accept the truth. It will be better for you to accept the truth now before it will be too late and you should also fear that day when all your friends here on nairaland will not be able to intercede for you because a soul's problem will be sufficient for him to bear and will not have time to look into the affair of another person.

You have tried in so many ways to bring or lay your hands on any contradiction from the Quran. But each time you do, you are always refuted and explained to. Remember, its this same book you are calling false I have been using for you as measure of standard when your bible failed you. How many times I have quoted verses from the Quran and bible and used the two in judging issues? Can the bible stand the same test with the Quran? Is the bible comparable with the Quran? Can the authenticity of the bible be ascertained? etc

Also, on that day, you will be asked if you have heard anything about Islam. its not even on the D day alone. Man's sufferness/enjoyment starts immediately he is being laid in the grave and buried in the earth. I wonder what you will tell God when you are being asked questions on

1. who is your God (I just beg you not to mention Jesus)

2. What do you know about Muhammed (here I wonder what you will say about the prophet you have been speaking ill of)

3. What is your religion (hope you will not mention anything aside Islam)

Let me rest my case here. A word is enough for the wise

I am still available anytime you will be needing my service.

Accept Islam today and be saved.

Maa Salam

Peace

0
Avatar
Newbie

@drbelliom

You are wasting your time with me. Prepare to meet your Maker Take those your books and be ready to meet a dreaded God (JESUS).

I will no longer engage anyone from Islamic view on their belief. I know you like me to argue with you but I have much work to do to Christianity than to Argue with you.

You don't beleive in Jesus and you regard the bible as false.

I regard the quran as false and Mohamed a demon possessed man with nothing but ETERNAL DAMNATION. PERIOD

0
Avatar
Newbie

Backslider

All you wrote here are basic blablabla phylosophically argumentative statements, NOT FACTS!

did you read all they wrote on the thread? check it again.

besides note the statements - the author of Mark. the author of Matthew etc, you know why?,

simple - authors unknown. and to date that is the truth. I wanted to hear things "like God said in Mark or Matthew or Luke etc, especially if they stop copying from one another.

religion is not about too much talk or beign able to present arguments well, but it is about the facts presented to Mankind by God (my Lord and your Lord - as said by Jesus). now as I told you, you cannot say God said so so and so, but the writers of Mark, writers of Matthew etc,

Lets talk about God.

no offense

peace.

0
Avatar
Newbie

@trini_girl,

After all the 'observation', have you commented on the real issue at hand? Where's your own contribution to the topic of this thread?

0
Avatar
Newbie

@trini_girl,

I really don't know why you're doing this to yourself, and I don't know what you're hoping to gain out of all these (if at all you're right).  I wanted to clear up this issue of shahan and syrup myself, but syrup herself has already done perfect justice to that.

Just to add some more to the differences:

To the best of my knowledge,

# syrup does not seem Nigerian to me, whereas shahan is a full-blooded Yoruba lady from South-West Nigeria.

# shahan is currently in Wales as I type, while syrup is busy enjoying herself in the FCT, Nigeria.

Regards.

0
Avatar
Newbie

@trini_girl,

Thank you so very much for making me the very same person as shahan. I guess you're not the first to have thought so; and there's no harm in it, afterall you were only expressing an "observation".

However, let me state categorically that I am NOT the same person as shahan. I don't know the best proof you want for that; but if this will be of any help, here's an email I sent to my "alter" nearly a forthnight ago:

Hi 'shahan',

I was wondering if you're in Abuja at the moment and thot we could meet up. Been following your write ups and simply love the way you articulate your persuasions. Lol. Many on the forum are beginning to wonder if we're the very same person; perhaps we should keep them going?

I'm presently in Maitama. And if you're not too busy, then we could meet up soon?

Cheers.

That email was sent on the evening of March 6th; but I haven't received a reply from her. The next morning 7th, I travelled impromptu with my husband to Lagos; and so did not have the time to make any responses to some of the other issues awaiting my responses to them.

For instance, I was going to reply to Bobbyaf's post on Hell Fire: A Twisted Truth Untangled; and to babs787's on The Holy Bible And Prophet Muhammed. When I checked the threads later, I found to my delight that shahan had addressed most of the issues in reference to Bobbyaf's; although she did not do so in babs787's.

Further, here are a few things you should bear in mind:

(a) shahan claims to have been a muslim - and her posts in debating muslims are almost persuasive that she was: whereas, I have never been a Muslim at all.

(b) shahan is not yet married (at least, to the best of my knowledge); whereas, I got married late last year to a Nigerian from the East (Igbo).

(c) I was on Nairaland long before shahan showed up; if I were the same person, what would be the point of assuming another username to get praised on the Forum?

(d) shahan and I had/have different stances in some issues, such as in the Pastor Chris Oyakhilome thread. There, shahan (in my opinion) was directly accusative; whereas, I questioned the criticism against Pastor Chris (even though I may have been wrong and many rejoinders actually said so).

(e) I showed appreciation to several Nairalanders including TayoD, Analytical and gbade. x - would I also be all these people, by the same theory you devised?

Once again, I thank you so very much for your "observation"; and it is inconsequential if shahan shows up another 2 1/2 hours to react to this. I simply wanted to open your eyes to what you didn't see; and yes, I appreciate the well-articulated rejoinder by goodguy to this petty "observation".

0
Avatar
Newbie

judas is like a lot of friends i know. will plant a knife deep in your back to the hilt for personal gain.definitely a betrayer!

0
Avatar
Newbie

The above again strengthens my inner feelings that this topics mischievously stated as being for "clarification" and "enlightenment" are nothing but tools in the hands of folks who desperately seek recognition.

When we begin to thank avowed atheists for "bringing us back on track", and include folks who treat our christian faith with contempt as among those who have the "insight" to "enlighten" us on irrelevant topics such as Judas Iscariot then something is terribly wrong somewhere.

Again these are simply my oppinions that the "enlightened" members of this group are free to disregard.

0
Avatar
Newbie

mrmayor,

Thanks for bringing us back on track.

@ all. . So far, I have not seen anyone arguing on the case of Judas here, and I believe that's enough to make you realise that this is not a topic intended for any debate. I reiterate for the 3rd time, that this topic is intended for clarification, and to clear any misconceptions.

Now again, not david or trini_girl, the Bible scholars have attempted to clarify, and if/when shahan comes in again to chip in her 50 cents, and is subsequently applauded for it, we'll be accused of worshipping her.

Now I'm pleading with you guys again, please stick to the topic at hand. If you do not have anything to offer, please keep mute and allow those with insight to enlighten us; you'll probably learn one or two things.

Shalom.

0
Avatar
Newbie

Where are those involved in this academic exercise? Perhaps things will get even more illuminated with the inputs of an atheist.

0
Avatar
Newbie

@mrmayor

mrmayor said "I will complete my analysis of Judas later,"

Im not too sure Mr. Kurt Saxon would find your plagiarism amusing.

http://www.kurtsaxon.com/atheist003.htm

debate ke.

0
Avatar
Newbie

You see the futility in many of these so called "debates" when confessed unbelievers begin to "help us" analyse the scriptures. . .

0
Avatar
Newbie

THE CASE FOR JUDAS AS ENABLER.

http://www.kurtsaxon.com/atheist003.htm

0
Avatar
Newbie

@ backslider,

I am not offended.

@ trini_girl,

I can see why you support TV01, but let me state that am sorry mentioning names but I could not hide the disgust I felt when I saw goodguys post, most of his post have even been annoying though. Seems to be the re-incarnate of Reverend!

As to TV01, I know what I am saying!

0
Avatar
Newbie

@David and Pataki

Amen To that.

But we need to share scripture also Instead of watching Immoral pictures that corrupt the mind.

I will rather be here sharing my Idea of Scripture. We also should be challenge by GODLY THINGS.

I will want all of us to share scripture.

Please Dont Go brothers and sisters Dont be Offended.

0
Avatar
Newbie

@ All

I cannot Judge your intentions as some of them seem pure but the reality or what I see is that Shahan Does lot Of Analyzes and Inputs, some are Academic and Some Have a lot of morality in it.

However I sense that we should put and point with the brush of Knowledge of Christ Righteousness and a HIGH HOLINESS BUILDING.

WE COULD BE DOING JUST KNOWLEDGE i.e WHAT WE KNOW.

Dont get me wrong I am humbled by the Knowledge of others and the ability of what the brain can hold of the Knowledge of Christ.

However We are not going to be Judged by the Knowledge of what we Know in scripture but we shall be Judged by our actions by Scripture.

0
Avatar
Newbie

Am even beginning to loose great interest nowadays. But that does not mean I will not stop to harangue you blaba if you mess it up with me again!

0
Avatar
Newbie

@ Alfa goodguy,

Never knew you had come here to postulate another of your unfounded theories again. It is basically the language of the heretics that you speak here. Maybe you need the likes of blaba 787 to help you out further.

Funny enough I just got out from a ban in another thread! Will be back to shed some lil understanding that I have to your heresy.

0
Avatar
Newbie

@goodguy

Happy now,mate?

0
Avatar
Newbie

@shahan,

That does not mean that I wholeheartedly agree to your explanation above. You explained the issue based on your own understanding and interpretation. All the same, thumbs up for the lenghty post.

Cheers.

0
Avatar
Newbie

Wow! How interesting.

@goodguy, has ur question been answered now?

0
Avatar
Newbie

Why would the authorities pay to have someone pointed out to them whom they already knew?

very simple in those days we did not have Photo pictures for positive Identification. JUDAS HAD TO HELP. They had to be sure they have the Right person. HIS PAY FOR THAT JOB IS 30 PIECES OF SILVER.

REMEMBER JESUS WAS A NAZERENE

0
Avatar
Newbie

@GoodGuy

One great Preacher once said. That if our wisdom is to KNOW and has no SPIRITUAL INFLUENCE ON OUR LIFE THEN IT IS ALL DUNG.

I HAVE LEARNT THAT IF IT IS KNOWLEDGE OF GOD SATAN HAS IT PLENTY LOOK FROM ETERNITY TO ETERNITY HE HAS BEEN WITH GOD HE WAS CAST DOWN TO TIME.

KNOWLEDGE CANNOT SAVE SATAN NOR HIS SERVANT FROM THE COMING WRATH OF GOD.

NOW I HAVE EXPLAINED THE CHOICES THAT WERE GIVEN TO JUDAS, HE CHOOSE DEATH.

YOU WILL SEE THAT JUDAS WAS REMORSE AND KILLED HIMSELF BECAUSE HE CHOOSE THIS.

PETER BETRAYED JESUS HE DID NOT KILL HIMSELF.

I REPEAT AGAIN IF ALL THIS EXERCISES IS ALL ABOUT OUR BIBLE KNOWLEDGE THEN WE HAVE WASTED TIME.

SELAH

0
Avatar
Newbie

Why are there few responses on this thread?

Cos its not some kinda easy mathematics question that u check the back of the text book & see the answers.

So if u don't any more responses,my guy, gba kámú

0
Avatar
Newbie

@Goodguy

Now Let us Understand The Rudimentary of God .

1) He is Holy 1billion percent

2)He lives in eternity

3)He came to Time Zone

4)He went back to Eternity

5)He carried life called the Everlasting

#1

means he is pure he hates sin and anything hates anything that causes sin and carries sin (I really dont know how to explain this Literally).

Examples SATAN SINNED AGAINST HIM. THEY ARE AT WAR.

BUT BECAUSE THE WILL OF SATAN IS ONE i.e NOBODY TEMPTED SATAN NO BODY CAN SAVE SATAN

MORESO SATAN CANNOT REPENT BECAUSE HE DWELLS IN ETERNITY AND THINGS KEEP REOCURRING(THE WORM DIED NOT) THE FACT IS THAT SATAN WILL BE TORMENTED BY THE THOUGHT THAT HE WANTED TO OVERTHROW GOD AND RULE GOD THAT WAS HIS SIN HIS SIN. GOD CANNOT FORGIVE SATAN. SATAN STILL HABOURS THE FACT HE WANTS TO OVER RULE GOD. (EVIDENCE? SATAN TEMPTING JESUS)

#2

GOD LIVE IN ENTERNITY HE IS ETERNAL AND CAN SEE MANS HEART AND THE EVIL THOUGHTS BUT DOES NOT PARTAKE IN THE DECISION OF MAN.

#3 HE CAME TO EARTH WHERE WE HAVE DAY AND NIGHT i.e The earth has an end. IT EVEN SAYS IT WILL BE DESTROYED BY FIRE.

#4 WHAT THIS MEANS THAT JESUS OR THE WORD EXPERIENCE LIVES FOR EVER AND EVER BECAUSE THOUGH HE EXPERIENCED IN EARTH. SO THE EVENT OF CALVARY CONTINUES TO REOCCUR.

#5

THE LIFE THAT JESUS CARRIED IS EVERLASTING (ZOE) AND ANY ONE THAT DOES NOT ACCEPT THIS LIFE IS DOOMED IN ETERNITY.

IF YOU UNDERSTAND THIS THEN YOU WILL KNOW THAT JUDAS HAD THE CHANCE TO REFUSE THIS AND GO INTO ETERNITY WITH GOD BECAUSE HIS DESIRE FOR MATERIAL THINGS HE WAS LOST.

THERE ARE PEOPLE JESUS SEEMED "CRUEL" TO BUT HE WAS DEALING WITH THEM ACCORDING TO THEIR HEART. LIKE THE WOMAN THAT CAME TO JESUS FOR MIRACLE AND JESUS USED THE DOG AND THE WOMANS RESPONSE WAS A HUMBLE ONE THE CRUMBS FROM THE TABLE THE DOGS WILL EAT.

WHEN GOD PUT HIS VEST OF WAR DONT GET IN HIS WAY. IN THAT VEST IS HIS LOVE ALSO AND BOTH YOU CANT TAKE ONE AND LEAVE THE OTHER. I WILL PREACH THIS ANY WHERE I GO.

JUDAS HAD ALL THE LOVE OF GOD DIRECTED AT HIM BUT HE REFUSED AND LOVED MONEY THAN HIM

THERE MANY PASTORS THAT ARE JUDAS GOD USES THEM THOUGH BUT THEY ARE SINNERS AND LOST THE GRACE OF GOD.

SELAH

0
Avatar
Newbie

Enabler.

Without him and what he did,there would be no christianity today.

If he had refused to betray Jesus,then he would have betrayed Jesus,pure and simple.

Judas is christianity's greatest hero,or maybe i should say,"Antihero".He sacrificed himself so that y'all can have a christ.In other words,he is THE ENABLER.

Y'all take it or leave it.

0
Avatar
Newbie

@Goodguy

I would have done a great deal of response but I am sorry I will wait for Great analist to do you the honor before I come in because this topic is very deep and touches the very heart of the NATURE of the Almighty.

In the Deep Dark sayings of the Almighty you have to understand things by prayer and Supplication.

It is however painful when you supply a direct response from your years of worship and it is Subjected to mere Academic analyzes and you are called a Heretic.

Shalom Shalom

0
Avatar
Newbie

How can we then determine which portion of the scripture was invented to suit a particular purpose.

Personally, I tend to place the words of christ in the highest level of truth. If we decide to apply that principle in the exposition written above, we could say this;

Words of Christ:

John 6:70-71 70 Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?

Matthew 26:24; Mark 14:21) he said, "But woe to that one by whom the Son of Man is betrayed for it would have been better for him had he never been born.

I believe that the above 2 passages have clearly shown the destiny of Judas. All the other (seeming) contradictions were not Christs direct words, and thus should not be used as a yardstick to determine the destiny of Judas.

0
Avatar
Newbie

Hmn. . .Interesting. . .I dey come.

0
Avatar
Newbie
Your answer
Add image

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.