«Home

Nadal Vs Federer.who Is The King?

I read a lot of sports chat forums and find people ickering about who is the better between this two greats.What do u think?

Avatar
Newbie
22 answers

There is no point abusing each other,let's be objective in our comments.

Everyone has reasons for his own comments and I think dat should be respected.

0
Avatar
Newbie

so u were talking to urself?

hehehehe

free me abeg

0
Avatar
Newbie

Theres no point dragging this any further. I believe i have made my point. Lights out for me.

0
Avatar
Newbie

@usbcable

dont mind me

made ma points jeje and i got attacked ( and i responded just the way they'll understand)

nyways, you made good points

0
Avatar
Newbie

@tkb417

take it easy man.

Its not an anhilation debate.

Easily easily sofry sofry table your argument nah. no need abuse everyone.

@topic,

On titles made

FED-EXPRESS(federer) wins

On current form i.e. rankings

NADAL rules

On records

I guess Nadal also rules(note I said I guess)

reasons:

1.first to win both roland garros and wimbledon at same time, back to back, and already done it twice.

2.first to beat fed on both courts of clay and grass

3.first to win the olympics

N.B

all the record is a comparism with federer.

if you gat more records of either player kindly state it

So on my own take, Nadal is better.

Moreover I LOVE NADAL.

0
Avatar
Newbie

2) if you cannot be insulted, never make insultive posts. Ill advise you go back and read ur first comments to me

3) ill curse your dad and mum as soon as the MOD gives me the go ahead

Hhehehehehe

beast of no nation feeling funky on the net

have you made your father proud already? doofus

0
Avatar
Newbie

ur over syllabus rant was what?

hyprocrisy sometimes shd be dealt with at the bar beach with ur back tied to stakes and u shot in the skull

stop throwing up like a daftie

0
Avatar
Newbie

if FED is 29 and Nadal is younger

doesnt it make sense to you that if Nadal and FED are both 29, he'll probably have won more titles?

they didnt start the same time, hence u cant tell me FED is better cos hes won more

laffable isnt

FED started his ATP career in 1998, Nadal started in 2002 at age 15

adjusting for time, or say they started together in 1998, will the difference in titles be there at all?

to remove ambiguity and silly subjective comments, sports people are made to compete with themselves year in year out

You cannot compare Pele to Maradona cos they never played or started footie at the same time

today, the ranking says Nadal is better

end off story

0
Avatar
Newbie

Isn't the answer obvious. . . . of course, Federer is the better player

0
Avatar
Newbie

this is nonsense. The title asked a question - Fed or Nadal who is the better player? the answer is Federer. Has nothing to do with current juice.

Dudes have "caught up" to Federer BECAUSE he is 29! He wont be 20 forever . . . at some point his body is bound to give out. If the dudes who have caught up with him can only beat him now that he is old and spent then i dont consider them serious contenders. Besides Rafa Nadal, who else could beat Federer at his peak?

Actually, Nadal's brilliance is not down to "weight of shot" (something you hear from folks who only watch tennis 4 times a yr), if not the likes of Soderling, DelPotro, Davydenko would be multiple slam winners by now.

0
Avatar
Newbie

Currently it is Nadal with the JUICE

Dudes have caught up to Federer. Nadal's weight of shot can still grind down the field.

whether nadal can last for years is another questions.

0
Avatar
Newbie

Federer and that's coming from a devoted Nadal fan.

0
Avatar
Newbie

^^^^ typical moronic response from empty heads

if u went to school, u'll know its allowed to benchmark, relate like terms/events/activities to make informed inferences

afofun alainironu ara galatia

0
Avatar
Newbie

Typical over syllabus from overzealous fans. Let it remain on tennis&dnt bring in football. Who won the most grand slam titles to date? Who has worn the four grand slams of the 2 to date? Once u answer these. We would know the greatest

0
Avatar
Newbie

another waste of bandwith from a Mofo

I am not comparing Maradona to Pele cos they played in diff eras. The comparison is between 2 clubs and 2 tennis players presently playing active footie and tennis

The only thing past records is good for is to seed players/teams in tennis/football; past records  has got no bearing when determining how good you are. FYI doofus, Nadal is number 1 on ATP ranking but has won fewer grandslams compared to FED. Barca is the present la liga champion but they havent won as many trophies as Real Madrid.

How good you are today is what we are interested in if not, Brasil would have been handed the world cup b4 the world cup kicked off

will you say Aston Villa is a greater club than Arsenal cos they won a UCL trophy and arsenal hasnt?

I think NL is fast becoming a gathering of intellectually incapacitated people

and he comes in full swagger confidently posting opaks

u shd be a sacrificial lamb to the gods of intelligence

0
Avatar
Newbie

@ tkb417

What a confused soul you are. You are desperately trying to hang on to any strings as you fall down the pits of ignominy.

You cannot compare two great champions based on their form at this very second. It is based on their form over their respective careers or years as a club.

Like wise can you compare maradonna in 1986 with pele in 1966?

At first i did not even want to waste cerebral space responding to your questions.

0
Avatar
Newbie

u started it by saying who has won more titles between Nadal and Federer right?

by your dumb analogy, Federer is the king cos he has won more titles

who has more titles between Madrid and Barca? answer is Madrid

will anyone say Madrid are better than Barca today?

hell no

Barca shits on Madrid as we speak today

have u drawn any inference?

0
Avatar
Newbie

Let's look at it this way:Nadal is just getting to his prime while Federer's best years are ehind him so one shouldn't talk about the numer of titles each of them has won.

0
Avatar
Newbie

what title are u talking about?

how many una get compared to madrid?

0
Avatar
Newbie

i cannot help u

and oh yeah, im a Man U fan

0
Avatar
Newbie

Real Madrid and Barcelona

who has the most titles?

Barca is the king

as Barca is to footie, thats the way Nadal is to tennis

The new world order is heralding, Nadal shits on everyone

0
Avatar
Newbie

Nadal or Federer who has the most titles?

0
Avatar
Newbie
Your answer
Add image

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.